Skip to main content
Log in

A hybrid root transformation and decision on belief approach to monitor multiattribute Poisson processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of industrial applications of statistical process control involve more than one quality characteristics to be monitored. These characteristics are usually correlated, causing challenges for the monitoring methods. These challenges are resolved using multivariate quality control charts that have been widely developed in recent years. Nonetheless, multivariate process monitoring methods encounter a problem when the quality characteristics are of the attribute type and follow nonnormal distributions such as multivariate binomial or multivariate Poisson. Since the data analysis in the latter case is not as easy as the normal case, more complexities are involved to monitor multiattribute processes. In this paper, a hybrid procedure is developed to monitor multiattribute correlated processes, in which number of defects in each characteristic is important. Two phases are proposed to design the monitoring scheme. In the first phase, the inherent skewness of multiattribute Poisson data is almost removed using a root transformation technique. In the second phase, a method based on the decision on belief concept is employed. The transformed data obtained from the first phase are implemented on the decision on belief (DOB) method. Finally, some simulation experiments are performed to compare the performances of the proposed methodology with the ones obtained using the Hotelling T 2 and the MEWMA charts in terms of in-control and out-of-control average run length criteria. The simulation results show that the proposed methodology outperforms the other two methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to statistical quality control, 5th edn. Wiley, New York, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hotelling H (1947) Multivariate quality control. In: Eisenhart C, Hastay MW, Wallis WA (eds) Techniques of statistical analysis. Mac Graw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lowry CA, Montgomery DC (1995) A review of multivariate control charts. IIE Trans 27:800–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Golnabi S, Houshmand AA (1999) Multivariate Shewhart X-bar charts. Inter Stat, No. 4

  5. Woodall WH, Ncube MM (1985) Multivariate CUSUM quality control procedures. Technometrics 27:285–292

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Healy JD (1987) A note on multivariate CUSUM procedures. Technometrics 29:409–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lucas JM, Crosier RB (1982) Fast initial response for CUSUM quality control schemes: give your CUSUM a head start. Technometrics 24:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pignatiello JJ, Runger GC (1990) Comparisons of multivariate CUSUM charts. J Qual Technol 22:173–186

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lucas JM, Saccucci MS (1990) Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics 32:1–10

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowry CA, Woodall WH, Champ CW, Erigdon S (1992) A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 34:46–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2005) Fault diagnosis in multivariate control charts using artificial neural networks. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21:825–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niaki STA, Falalh Nezhad MS (2009) Decision-making in detecting and diagnosing faults of multivariate statistical quality control systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eshragh A, Modarres M (2009) A New approach to distribution fitting: decision on beliefs. J Ind Syst Eng 3:56–71

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eshragh A (2003) The application of decision on beliefs in response surface methodology. Unpublished M.S. project, Department of Industrial Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fallah Nezhad MS, Niaki STA (2010) A new monitoring design for univariate statistical quality control charts. Inf Sci 180:1051–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Niaki STA, Nafar M (2008) An artificial neural network approach to monitor and diagnose multi-attribute quality control processes. J Ind Eng Int 4:10–24

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mukhopadhyay AR (2008) Multivariate attribute control chart using Mahalanobis D2 statistic. J Appl Stat 35:421–429

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang SF, Yeh JT (2011) Using cause selecting control charts to monitor dependent process stages with attributes data. Expert Syst Appl 38:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li J, Tsung F, Zou C (2012) Directional control schemes for multivariate categorical processes. J Qual Technol 44:136–154

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chiu JE, Kuo TI (2010) Control charts for fraction nonconforming in a bivariate binomial process. J Appl Stat 37:1717–1728

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2009) Monitoring multi-attribute processes based on NORTA inverse transformed vectors. Commun Stat Theory Methods 38:964–979

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Niaki STA, Akbari-Nasaji S (2011) A hybrid method of artificial neural network and simulated annealing in monitoring auto-correlated multi-attribute processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56:777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Niaki STA, Khedmati M (2012) Estimating the change point of the parameter vector of multivariate Poisson processes monitored by a multiattribute T2 control chart. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4128-x

    Google Scholar 

  24. Patel HI (1973) Quality control methods for multivariate binomial in controlling high yield processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int 8:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lu XS, Xie M, Goh TN, Lai CD (1998) Control chart for multivariate attribute processes. Int J Prod Res 36:3477–3489

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Larpkiattaworn S (2003) A neural network approach for multi-attributes processes control with comparison of two current techniques and guideline for practical use. University of Pittsburgh, USA, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  27. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2007) On the monitoring of multi-attribute high-quality production processes. Metrika 66:373–388

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Quesenberry CP (1995) Geometric Q-charts for high quality processes. J Qual Technol 27:304–315

    Google Scholar 

  29. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2007) Bootstrap method approach in designing multi-attribute control charts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2008) A transformation technique in designing multi-attribute C control charts. Scientica Iran 15:125–130

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Chiu JE, Kuo TI (2008) Attribute control chart for multivariate Poisson distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods 37:146–158

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Box G, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformation. J Roy Stat Soc 26:211–242

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2011) A simple transformation method in skewness reduction. Int J Eng Trans A 24:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fallahnezhad MS (2012) A new EWMA monitoring design for multi-variate quality control problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(5):751–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2008) Generating correlation matrices for normal random vectors in NORTA algorithm using artificial neural networks. J Uncertain Syst 2:192–201

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thisted RA (2000) Elements of statistical computing: numerical computation. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. T. A. Niaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niaki, S.T.A., Javadi, S. & Fallahnezhad, M.S. A hybrid root transformation and decision on belief approach to monitor multiattribute Poisson processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75, 1651–1660 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6263-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6263-z

Keywords

Navigation